Chickasaw vs Comanche Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Comanche
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Comanche
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.8%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Comanche Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,752,173 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.184 and weighted average of 13.8%, a difference of 1.9%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Comanche |
Minimum | 2.2% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 33.0% | 38.9% |
Range | 30.8% | 33.4% |
Mean | 15.0% | 16.6% |
Median | 14.0% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 20.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 7.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Comanche by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from Haiti (13.8%, a difference of 0.010%), West Indian (13.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Shoshone (13.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Barbados (13.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (13.7%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 13.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 13.7% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 13.8% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 13.8% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 13.8% |