Chickasaw vs Jamaican Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Jamaican
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Jamaicans
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Jamaican Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,625,725 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.253 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 2.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Jamaican |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 49.4% |
| Range | 30.8% | 44.8% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 14.1% |
| Median | 14.0% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 15.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Jamaicans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Iroquois (13.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Guyana (13.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Jamaica (13.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Subsaharan African (13.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |