Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,258,093 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 3.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 30.5% |
| Range | 30.8% | 26.6% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 14.5% |
| Median | 14.0% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 17.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Spanish American (13.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Cree (13.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and Guyanese (13.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Immigrants from Liberia (13.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican American Indian (13.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |