Apache Male Poverty
COMPARE
Apache
Select to Compare
Male Poverty
Apache Male Poverty
17.7%
POVERTY | MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,014,108 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 17.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.24% in poverty level among males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Apache and poverty level among males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Apache influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among males within an area, or if Apache simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Apache by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Cheyenne (17.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Native/Alaskan (16.9%, a difference of 4.4%), Pueblo (18.5%, a difference of 4.8%), Houma (16.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and Sioux (18.7%, a difference of 5.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |
Apache Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Apache Data | Male Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.085% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 99.7% | 77.3% |
Range | 99.6% | 74.2% |
Mean | 36.8% | 30.4% |
Median | 16.9% | 25.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 15.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 79.9% | 47.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 73.1% | 31.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 36.3% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 36.0% | 18.6% |
Correlation Details
Apache Percentile | Sample Size | Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.085% | 224,518,324 | 12.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 4,777,634 | 13.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 898,664 | 14.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 332,860 | 17.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 174,407 | 17.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69% | 55,900 | 18.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 43,369 | 15.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.73% | 11,718 | 18.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.34% | 42,778 | 13.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.83% | 27,202 | 19.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.25% | 32,675 | 17.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.72% | 11,702 | 18.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.23% | 3,289 | 37.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.75% | 963 | 75.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.29% | 2,482 | 47.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.76% | 219 | 53.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.18% | 489 | 6.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.86% | 734 | 5.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 8,287 | 12.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.35% | 414 | 5.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.30% | 6,319 | 17.5% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.33% | 225 | 25.8% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.02% | 271 | 16.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.90% | 2,563 | 21.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.50% | 342 | 13.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.69% | 1,479 | 9.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.43% | 1,065 | 28.5% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.90% | 71 | 40.9% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.16% | 169 | 9.4% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.45% | 618 | 16.5% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.00% | 10 | 50.0% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.22% | 27 | 50.0% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.02% | 246 | 15.6% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.26% | 46 | 50.0% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.01% | 147 | 39.7% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.59% | 133 | 49.2% |
[ 42.5% - 43.0% ] 42.73% | 227 | 59.1% |
[ 64.5% - 65.0% ] 64.77% | 457 | 33.3% |
[ 76.5% - 77.0% ] 76.94% | 2,650 | 19.7% |
[ 78.0% - 78.5% ] 78.32% | 7,067 | 38.9% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.81% | 2,261 | 20.0% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.86% | 4,405 | 53.6% |
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.68% | 4,860 | 28.5% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.63% | 980 | 30.3% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.87% | 11,840 | 37.7% |
[ 87.0% - 87.5% ] 87.10% | 837 | 3.1% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.66% | 3,130 | 47.8% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.14% | 1,621 | 50.7% |
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.48% | 4,284 | 44.5% |
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.28% | 3,110 | 77.3% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.84% | 1,592 | 54.8% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.19% | 2,173 | 35.4% |
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.31% | 2,497 | 38.5% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.39% | 1,552 | 36.9% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 99.72% | 724 | 68.8% |