Chickasaw vs British West Indian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
British West Indian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
British West Indians
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs British West Indian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,618,428 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British West Indians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 8.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | British West Indian |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 0.21% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 30.9% |
| Range | 30.8% | 30.7% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 12.5% |
| Median | 14.0% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 15.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to British West Indians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British West Indians are Chippewa (14.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Honduras (14.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Somalia (14.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and Immigrants from Grenada (14.7%, a difference of 0.74%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 14.6% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 14.7% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |