Chickasaw vs Cape Verdean Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Cape Verdean
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Cape Verdeans
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Cape Verdean Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,527,352 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 3.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Cape Verdean |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 31.5% |
| Range | 30.8% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 12.7% |
| Median | 14.0% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Cape Verdeans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Spanish American (13.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and Cree (13.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |