Chickasaw vs Australian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Australian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Australians
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Australian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,991,142 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.384 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 29.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Australian |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 29.1% |
| Range | 30.8% | 27.0% |
| Mean | 15.0% | 10.7% |
| Median | 14.0% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 5.6% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Jordanian (10.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), British (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Indian (Asian) (10.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 95.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 95.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |