Immigrants from Israel Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Israel
Select to Compare
Male Poverty
Immigrants from Israel Male Poverty
10.8%
POVERTY | MALES
80.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Israel Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,930,227 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 10.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.54% in poverty level among males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Israel and poverty level among males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Israel influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among males within an area, or if Immigrants from Israel simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Israel by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Israel are Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.31%), New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants from Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants from Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants from Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants from Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants from France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants from Israel Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Israel Data | Male Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.027% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 15.8% | 37.1% |
| Range | 15.8% | 36.6% |
| Mean | 2.8% | 10.2% |
| Median | 1.9% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.97% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.3% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 7.0% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Israel Percentile | Sample Size | Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.027% | 115,562,536 | 12.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.087% | 38,220,884 | 10.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 13,694,293 | 9.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 16,516,079 | 12.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 6,129,412 | 8.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 7,161,168 | 12.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 2,284,114 | 10.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 1,616,652 | 8.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 1,374,067 | 10.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 823,330 | 9.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.63% | 961,573 | 9.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 600,189 | 7.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 645,270 | 6.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 480,059 | 10.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 631,732 | 12.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 649,881 | 10.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 1.00% | 218,851 | 7.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.06% | 260,244 | 8.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 348,001 | 5.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 186,632 | 6.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.24% | 112,624 | 28.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.28% | 149,842 | 6.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 88,001 | 8.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 99,222 | 18.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 40,861 | 9.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 87,458 | 22.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 112,500 | 8.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 1,350 | 3.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 49,604 | 5.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.78% | 121,872 | 19.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 79,001 | 5.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 6,249 | 9.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 57,642 | 3.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 1,445 | 7.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.08% | 6,244 | 19.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 57,847 | 7.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 56,038 | 11.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.34% | 13,401 | 5.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 20,180 | 5.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 16,190 | 4.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62% | 62,698 | 8.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69% | 74,332 | 4.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,136 | 1.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.81% | 39,621 | 10.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.96% | 5,070 | 3.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 6,764 | 14.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 41,621 | 37.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 31,910 | 5.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.33% | 32,881 | 10.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 54 | 3.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 106 | 15.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.82% | 2,750 | 5.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.10% | 20,411 | 11.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.66% | 1,438 | 9.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 31,517 | 10.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20% | 3,440 | 2.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.35% | 1,066 | 3.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.49% | 18,210 | 1.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.96% | 9,860 | 0.49% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.42% | 1,366 | 12.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.39% | 308 | 9.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.85% | 295 | 10.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.03% | 349 | 35.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.84% | 486 | 24.5% |