Aleut vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Aleut
Ute
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Aleuts
Ute
16.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
28.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Ute Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,541,696 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%, a difference of 29.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut | Ute |
| Minimum | 6.6% | 9.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 93.4% | 90.4% |
| Mean | 27.1% | 33.1% |
| Median | 17.4% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.1% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.4% | 39.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.3% | 21.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.5% | 22.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.2% | 22.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Spanish (16.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (16.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from the Azores (16.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and Kenyan (16.8%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| South American Indians | 35.0 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 34.6 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.8% |
| Arabs | 34.5 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.8% |
| Kenyans | 32.3 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 31.3 /100 | #192 | Fair 16.8% |
| Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
| Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
| Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
| Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |