Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,062,660 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Sri Lanka communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sri Lanka within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sri Lanka corresponds to an increase of 71.1 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($120,263 compared to $97,958, a difference of 22.8%), per capita income ($50,555 compared to $41,495, a difference of 21.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,094 compared to $98,340, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,512 compared to $55,543, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and median female earnings ($44,161 compared to $39,376, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 37.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 21.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.37%), female poverty (12.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and poverty (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.9%), divorced or separated (10.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.7%), and births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.71%), currently married (48.1% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 53.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 37.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 132.5%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 100.3%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 78.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 45.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 40.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 15.6%).