Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,637,287 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.113. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 32.6 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $41,495, a difference of 14.2%), median family income ($108,830 compared to $97,958, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $55,543, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.060%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $93,661, a difference of 4.5%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $39,376, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 31.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.56%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.8%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.33%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.65%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 55.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 38.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.35%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 81.8%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 71.2%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 33.7%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.5%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.4%).