Chickasaw vs Armenian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Armenian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Armenians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,687
SOCIAL INDEX
54.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
170th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Armenian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,424,142 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.641. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Armenians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 24.8 Armenians.
![Chickasaw Integration in Armenian Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-armenians/chickasaw-vs-armenians-community-integration.webp)
Chickasaw vs Armenian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $103,248, a difference of 32.5%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $48,287, a difference of 32.4%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $91,807, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 9.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,656, a difference of 14.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,179, a difference of 18.8%).
![Chickasaw vs Armenian Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-armenians/chickasaw-vs-armenians-income.webp)
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Armenian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $48,287 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $109,692 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $91,807 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $49,804 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $58,134 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $42,212 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $53,179 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $103,248 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $107,002 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Good $61,656 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 24.8% |
Chickasaw vs Armenian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (26.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 43.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 39.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 17.6%).
![Chickasaw vs Armenian Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-armenians/chickasaw-vs-armenians-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Armenian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Good 12.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Good 13.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Excellent 15.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Excellent 15.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 26.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 11.1% |
Chickasaw vs Armenian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
![Chickasaw vs Armenian Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-armenians/chickasaw-vs-armenians-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Armenian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chickasaw vs Armenian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
![Chickasaw vs Armenian Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-armenians/chickasaw-vs-armenians-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Armenian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Fair 64.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Average 79.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 32.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 72.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Fair 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Fair 82.5% |
Chickasaw vs Armenian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 38.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 34.6%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.9%).
![Chickasaw vs Armenian Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-armenians/chickasaw-vs-armenians-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Armenian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Average 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Good 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Average 46.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 26.2% |
Chickasaw vs Armenian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 19.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.2%).
![Chickasaw vs Armenian Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-armenians/chickasaw-vs-armenians-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Armenian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 90.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Excellent 56.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Good 19.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Excellent 6.6% |
Chickasaw vs Armenian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 58.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 47.0%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.21%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.67%).
![Chickasaw vs Armenian Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-armenians/chickasaw-vs-armenians-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Armenian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Poor 90.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Good 86.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 68.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 63.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 42.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chickasaw vs Armenian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 68.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 62.9%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 2.3%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 19.1%).
![Chickasaw vs Armenian Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-armenians/chickasaw-vs-armenians-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Armenian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 50.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Average 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.4% |