Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,504,644 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.403 and weighted average of 21.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 60.8%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Dutch West Indian	Immigrants from China
Minimum	9.2%	1.1%
Maximum	66.7%	24.4%
Range	57.4%	23.3%
Mean	27.2%	12.0%
Median	25.0%	11.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	20.2%	8.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	31.0%	14.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	10.8%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	11.4%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.2%	4.7%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Dutch West Indians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Immigrants from Somalia (21.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Bahamian (21.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Houma (21.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (21.4%, a difference of 0.63%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Indonesians	0.0 /100 \| #304	Tragic 21.3%
Guatemalans	0.0 /100 \| #305	Tragic 21.4%
Immigrants \| Central America	0.0 /100 \| #306	Tragic 21.4%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	0.0 /100 \| #307	Tragic 21.4%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #308	Tragic 21.5%
Bahamians	0.0 /100 \| #309	Tragic 21.5%
Immigrants \| Somalia	0.0 /100 \| #310	Tragic 21.6%
Dutch West Indians	0.0 /100 \| #311	Tragic 21.6%
Immigrants \| Mexico	0.0 /100 \| #312	Tragic 21.6%
Creek	0.0 /100 \| #313	Tragic 21.7%
Arapaho	0.0 /100 \| #314	Tragic 21.7%
Ute	0.0 /100 \| #315	Tragic 21.8%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.0 /100 \| #316	Tragic 21.9%
Africans	0.0 /100 \| #317	Tragic 21.9%
Immigrants \| Dominica	0.0 /100 \| #318	Tragic 22.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%