Dutch West Indian vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,770,604 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Dutch West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch West Indians corresponds to an increase of 40.0 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,922 compared to $55,082, a difference of 53.3%), median family income ($81,852 compared to $123,831, a difference of 51.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,171 compared to $118,932, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 10.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,816 compared to $54,830, a difference of 19.7%), and median female earnings ($34,106 compared to $44,587, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 52.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 52.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father poverty (19.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 36.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 37.2%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.2%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (64.3% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.15, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 124.4%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 117.1%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 95.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch West Indian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 59.2%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.1%).