Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Male Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Immigrants from Oceania
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Immigrants from Oceania
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
63.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
MALE POVERTY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,451,633 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,340,172 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 1.4%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 3.0% |
| Maximum | 31.0% | 23.0% |
| Range | 29.8% | 20.0% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 12.3% |
| Median | 9.0% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Immigrants from Oceania by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Scotch-Irish (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Soviet Union (11.1%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Pennsylvania German (11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Celtic (11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and South American (11.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |
| Colombians | 63.0 /100 | #158 | Good 11.0% |
| Taiwanese | 62.7 /100 | #159 | Good 11.0% |
| Soviet Union | 60.3 /100 | #160 | Good 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 59.7 /100 | #161 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #162 | Average 11.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 56.7 /100 | #163 | Average 11.1% |
| Ethiopians | 56.7 /100 | #164 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 55.5 /100 | #165 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 55.3 /100 | #166 | Average 11.1% |
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
| South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
| Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.2% |
| Celtics | 47.5 /100 | #175 | Average 11.2% |