Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Immigrants from Oceania
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Costa Ricans
Immigrants from Oceania
5.3%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
33.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
189th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Oceania Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,047,162 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,351,716 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.803 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 3.1%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 17.0% | 29.1% |
| Range | 15.9% | 27.9% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 7.9% |
| Median | 5.0% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 5.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Afghan (5.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Albania (5.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Ugandan (5.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Cherokee (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Belarus (5.3%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 42.6 /100 | #182 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 40.7 /100 | #183 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 40.1 /100 | #184 | Average 5.3% |
| Malaysians | 40.1 /100 | #185 | Average 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 39.4 /100 | #186 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 35.4 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.3% |
| Afghans | 33.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.3% |
| Costa Ricans | 33.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.3% |
| Ugandans | 31.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
| Cherokee | 30.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
| Portuguese | 28.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
| Arabs | 27.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.3% |
| Colombians | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 26.2 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.3% |
| Spaniards | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Asian (5.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
| Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |