Chickasaw vs Pennsylvania German Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,236,950 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pennsylvania Germans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Pennsylvania Germans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 44.1 Pennsylvania Germans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,852, a difference of 13.6%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $91,956, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,802, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $52,888, a difference of 1.6%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $37,842, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 24.5%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 23.1%), and male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 38.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.2%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.8%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.22%), family households (64.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 40.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.64%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.2%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pennsylvania German communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 26.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.6%).