Chickasaw vs Cree Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,956,780 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cree within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Cree. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 33.9 Cree.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cree communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 11.0%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $40,056, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $84,574, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,129, a difference of 0.74%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $49,497, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $42,777, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cree communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cree communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 25.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cree communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cree communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 7.9%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.020%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cree communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 47.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cree communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 16.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cree communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.3%).