Chickasaw vs Delaware Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Delaware
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Delaware
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,204
SOCIAL INDEX
29.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
228th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Delaware Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,737,882 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Delaware within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Delaware. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 28.3 Delaware.
![Chickasaw Integration in Delaware Communities](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-delaware/chickasaw-vs-delaware-community-integration.webp)
Chickasaw vs Delaware Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $94,914, a difference of 15.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $89,876, a difference of 15.3%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $80,527, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $47,159, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $58,214, a difference of 8.3%).
![Chickasaw vs Delaware Income](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-delaware/chickasaw-vs-delaware-income.webp)
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Delaware |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $40,778 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $96,958 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $80,527 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $44,783 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Poor $52,412 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $37,964 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $47,159 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $89,876 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $94,914 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $58,214 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Fair 26.3% |
Chickasaw vs Delaware Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.1%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
![Chickasaw vs Delaware Poverty](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-delaware/chickasaw-vs-delaware-poverty.webp)
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Delaware |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Fair 12.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Fair 9.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Poor 11.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Fair 13.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 18.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Poor 17.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Poor 17.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Poor 17.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 15.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 31.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 12.2% |
Chickasaw vs Delaware Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
![Chickasaw vs Delaware Unemployment](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-delaware/chickasaw-vs-delaware-unemployment.webp)
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Delaware |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Chickasaw vs Delaware Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
![Chickasaw vs Delaware Labor Participation](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-delaware/chickasaw-vs-delaware-labor-force.webp)
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Delaware |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 77.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Excellent 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.8% |
Chickasaw vs Delaware Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.5%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.31%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.63%).
![Chickasaw vs Delaware Family Structure](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-delaware/chickasaw-vs-delaware-family-structure.webp)
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Delaware |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Good 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Good 46.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 34.2% |
Chickasaw vs Delaware Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
![Chickasaw vs Delaware Vehicle Availability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-delaware/chickasaw-vs-delaware-vehicle-availability.webp)
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Delaware |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 58.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Chickasaw vs Delaware Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 13.7%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%).
![Chickasaw vs Delaware Education Level](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-delaware/chickasaw-vs-delaware-education-level.webp)
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Delaware |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Excellent 93.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Average 91.2% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 62.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 55.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 42.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 33.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chickasaw vs Delaware Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.7%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.5%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.2%).
![Chickasaw vs Delaware Disability](/correlation-charts/comparison/chickasaw-vs-delaware/chickasaw-vs-delaware-disability.webp)
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Delaware |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Fair 47.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Fair 17.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |