Chickasaw vs Delaware Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Delaware
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Delaware
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,204
SOCIAL INDEX
29.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
228th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Delaware Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,737,882 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Delaware within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Delaware. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 28.3 Delaware.
Chickasaw vs Delaware Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $94,914, a difference of 15.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $89,876, a difference of 15.3%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $80,527, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $47,159, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $58,214, a difference of 8.3%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Delaware |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $40,778 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $96,958 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $80,527 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $44,783 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Poor $52,412 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $37,964 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $47,159 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $89,876 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $94,914 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $58,214 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Fair 26.3% |
Chickasaw vs Delaware Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.1%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Delaware |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Fair 12.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Fair 9.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Poor 11.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Fair 13.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 18.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Poor 17.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Poor 17.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Poor 17.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 15.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 31.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 12.2% |
Chickasaw vs Delaware Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Delaware |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Chickasaw vs Delaware Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Delaware |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 77.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Excellent 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.8% |
Chickasaw vs Delaware Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.5%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.24%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.31%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.63%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Delaware |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Good 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Good 46.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 34.2% |
Chickasaw vs Delaware Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Delaware |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 58.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Chickasaw vs Delaware Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 13.7%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Delaware |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Excellent 93.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Average 91.2% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Fair 85.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 62.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 55.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 42.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 33.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chickasaw vs Delaware Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.7%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.5%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.2%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Delaware |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Fair 47.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Fair 17.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |