Chickasaw vs Paraguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,061,156 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Paraguayans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.337. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Paraguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 13.9 Paraguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $50,385, a difference of 38.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $106,615, a difference of 36.8%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $95,737, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $64,443, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,614, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 45.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 42.0%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.3%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.1%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 23.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.50%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.51%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 82.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 50.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 34.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 74.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 64.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.39%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paraguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 68.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 63.9%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 13.8%).