Chickasaw vs Iranian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,899,631 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Iranians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Iranians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 7.0 Iranians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $58,786, a difference of 61.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $129,350, a difference of 57.4%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $109,835, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 9.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,548, a difference of 24.1%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $47,421, a difference of 37.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 67.0%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 65.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.6%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 43.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 43.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.15%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.84%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 126.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 108.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 95.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 86.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 77.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 68.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 11.6%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.5%).