Chickasaw vs Spanish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,255,071 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Spanish within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Spanish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 5.9 Spanish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $98,554, a difference of 19.9%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,343, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $92,200, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.070%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,098, a difference of 10.7%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $45,432, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 20.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.40%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 11.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.77%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 6.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.0%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 27.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 6.6%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.7%).