Romanian vs Czech Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Czech
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Czechs

Excellent
Excellent
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Czech Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,959,451 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.236% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 236.4 Czechs.
Romanian Integration in Czech Communities

Romanian vs Czech Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,445 compared to $44,595, a difference of 8.6%), median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $38,992, a difference of 6.9%), and median household income ($91,994 compared to $86,164, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $51,421, a difference of 4.3%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $61,244, a difference of 4.7%).
Romanian vs Czech Income
Income MetricRomanianCzech
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Good
$44,595
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Excellent
$105,839
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Good
$86,164
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Good
$47,221
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Excellent
$56,546
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Poor
$38,992
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Poor
$51,421
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Good
$96,525
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Excellent
$103,507
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Average
$61,244
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
29.2%

Romanian vs Czech Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.3%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 0.72%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.9%).
Romanian vs Czech Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianCzech
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
9.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
12.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
15.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
13.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.2%

Romanian vs Czech Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 15.6%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.2%).
Romanian vs Czech Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianCzech
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%

Romanian vs Czech Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.95%).
Romanian vs Czech Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianCzech
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Excellent
65.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
43.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Exceptional
78.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.9%

Romanian vs Czech Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.2%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.13%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
Romanian vs Czech Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianCzech
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Good
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
49.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Exceptional
49.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Excellent
30.5%

Romanian vs Czech Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 59.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 16.6%).
Romanian vs Czech Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianCzech
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
6.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
61.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
22.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.4%

Romanian vs Czech Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.8%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.34%).
Romanian vs Czech Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianCzech
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
94.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
93.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
91.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
67.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Excellent
60.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Good
47.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Average
38.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Average
4.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Good
1.9%

Romanian vs Czech Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.6%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Romanian vs Czech Disability
Disability MetricRomanianCzech
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Average
11.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Excellent
2.1%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%