Immigrants from Oceania vs Czech Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Czech
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Czechs
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czech Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,230,362 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 28.6 Czechs.
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czech Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 13.8%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $61,244, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $51,421, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $103,507, a difference of 0.19%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $105,839, a difference of 0.58%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $47,221, a difference of 0.84%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Czech |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,220 | Good $44,595 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,453 | Excellent $105,839 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,100 | Good $86,164 |
Median Earnings | Excellent $47,617 | Good $47,221 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,712 | Excellent $56,546 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,297 | Poor $38,992 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,680 | Poor $51,421 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,623 | Good $96,525 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,705 | Excellent $103,507 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,416 | Average $61,244 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.6% | Tragic 29.2% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czech Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 24.9%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and family poverty (8.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.74%), single female poverty (20.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.4%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Czech |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Families | Good 8.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Females | Average 13.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.9% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.9% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.7% | Good 28.9% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.4% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czech Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 19.9%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.6%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Czech |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czech Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Czech |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.9% | Exceptional 43.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Exceptional 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.0% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 83.9% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czech Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.2%), currently married (46.5% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.060%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and family households (64.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.70%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Czech |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.9% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Good 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.29 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.5% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Good 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.6% | Excellent 30.5% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czech Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 41.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Czech |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.7% | Exceptional 6.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.4% | Exceptional 93.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Exceptional 61.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 22.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czech Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.4%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and high school diploma (88.8% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.79%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.79%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Czech |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Poor 93.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.2% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.8% | Exceptional 91.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Fair 85.5% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.6% | Exceptional 67.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.4% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Fair 45.8% | Good 47.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.3% | Average 38.0% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.7% | Average 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.6% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Good 1.9% |
Immigrants from Oceania vs Czech Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Oceania | Czech |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Average 11.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 24.0% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.0% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |