Immigrants from Jordan vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,369,562 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.114% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 113.6 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 11.0%), median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $38,992, a difference of 5.1%), and median household income ($89,412 compared to $86,164, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $51,421, a difference of 0.10%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $96,525, a difference of 0.68%), and per capita income ($45,066 compared to $44,595, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 27.2%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 3.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.4%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.6%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.87%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.9%), master's degree (16.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (67.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.0%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.1%).