Cherokee vs Czech Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cherokee
Czech
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cherokee
Czechs
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czech Integration in Cherokee Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,077,676 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.373. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to an increase of 13.7 Czechs.
Cherokee vs Czech Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,125 compared to $103,507, a difference of 20.2%), median family income ($88,209 compared to $105,839, a difference of 20.0%), and per capita income ($37,203 compared to $44,595, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $51,421, a difference of 7.5%), and median female earnings ($34,742 compared to $38,992, a difference of 12.2%).
Income Metric | Cherokee | Czech |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,203 | Good $44,595 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,209 | Excellent $105,839 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $72,682 | Good $86,164 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,252 | Good $47,221 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,669 | Excellent $56,546 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,742 | Poor $38,992 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,848 | Poor $51,421 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,843 | Good $96,525 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,125 | Excellent $103,507 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,133 | Average $61,244 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 29.2% |
Cherokee vs Czech Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 43.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 43.3%), and family poverty (10.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and single father poverty (19.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 15.8%).
Poverty Metric | Cherokee | Czech |
Poverty | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.7% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.7% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.5% | Good 28.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Cherokee vs Czech Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Cherokee | Czech |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.5% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Cherokee vs Czech Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cherokee | Czech |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.9% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Exceptional 43.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Exceptional 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.1% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.4% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.9% |
Cherokee vs Czech Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.7%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 20.1%), and divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.77%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Cherokee | Czech |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.5% | Good 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.7% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.7% | Good 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Excellent 30.5% |
Cherokee vs Czech Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.94%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cherokee | Czech |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 6.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 93.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.9% | Exceptional 61.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Exceptional 22.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Cherokee vs Czech Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 32.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%).
Education Level Metric | Cherokee | Czech |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Average 92.4% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.5% | Exceptional 91.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.1% | Exceptional 67.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.2% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.9% | Good 47.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Average 38.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Average 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Cherokee vs Czech Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Czech communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 36.9%), and ambulatory disability (7.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.7%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.3%).
Disability Metric | Cherokee | Czech |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.5% | Average 11.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Tragic 2.9% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.9% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |