Finnish vs Czech Community Comparison
COMPARE
Finnish
Czech
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Finns
Czechs
6,815
SOCIAL INDEX
65.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
141st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czech Integration in Finnish Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 379,685,594 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 21.0 Czechs.
Finnish vs Czech Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,904 compared to $103,507, a difference of 3.6%), median male earnings ($54,721 compared to $56,546, a difference of 3.3%), and median family income ($102,676 compared to $105,839, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $51,421, a difference of 0.79%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,610 compared to $96,525, a difference of 2.0%), and wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Income Metric | Finnish | Czech |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,461 | Good $44,595 |
Median Family Income | Average $102,676 | Excellent $105,839 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,607 | Good $86,164 |
Median Earnings | Fair $45,940 | Good $47,221 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,721 | Excellent $56,546 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,173 | Poor $38,992 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,827 | Poor $51,421 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $94,610 | Good $96,525 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Average $99,904 | Excellent $103,507 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,535 | Average $61,244 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.6% | Tragic 29.2% |
Finnish vs Czech Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Czech communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 10.2%), male poverty (10.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.12%), single male poverty (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
Poverty Metric | Finnish | Czech |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.3% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Single Females | Poor 21.5% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.0% | Good 28.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Finnish vs Czech Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Czech communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Finnish | Czech |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.9% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Fair 5.5% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Finnish vs Czech Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.72%).
Labor Participation Metric | Finnish | Czech |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.2% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.9% | Exceptional 43.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.7% | Exceptional 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Excellent 83.1% | Exceptional 83.9% |
Finnish vs Czech Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Czech communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.5%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.09 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.47%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and family households (63.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Finnish | Czech |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.6% | Good 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.1% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.09 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.8% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.5% | Good 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Average 31.7% | Excellent 30.5% |
Finnish vs Czech Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.70%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Finnish | Czech |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 6.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 93.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.3% | Exceptional 61.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.3% | Exceptional 22.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Finnish vs Czech Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Czech communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.9%), master's degree (14.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%).
Education Level Metric | Finnish | Czech |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.4% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.7% | Exceptional 91.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.9% | Exceptional 67.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.2% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.3% | Good 47.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.7% | Average 38.0% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.2% | Average 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.2% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Average 1.8% | Good 1.9% |
Finnish vs Czech Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.91%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.2%).
Disability Metric | Finnish | Czech |
Disability | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.1% | Average 11.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.2% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |