Shoshone vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,912,456 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.814. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.032% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to an increase of 1,031.8 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Czech communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,588 compared to $103,507, a difference of 23.8%), median family income ($87,872 compared to $105,839, a difference of 20.4%), and per capita income ($37,072 compared to $44,595, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,720 compared to $51,421, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($34,677 compared to $38,992, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,681 compared to $61,244, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 51.7%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 47.0%), and male poverty (13.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 10.3%), single mother poverty (32.9% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and single female poverty (25.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 73.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 68.8%), and male unemployment (7.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.4%), divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.11, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 57.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Czech communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 36.4%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 34.5%), and master's degree (11.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 28.1%), vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 28.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.4%).