Ethiopian vs Czech Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Czech
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ethiopians
Czechs
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Czech Integration in Ethiopian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,177,090 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.347. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to a decrease of 17.0 Czechs.
Ethiopian vs Czech Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 33.6%), median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $38,992, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $61,244, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,736 compared to $103,507, a difference of 0.22%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $96,525, a difference of 0.31%), and median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $56,546, a difference of 0.54%).
Income Metric | Ethiopian | Czech |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,569 | Good $44,595 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,251 | Excellent $105,839 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,640 | Good $86,164 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,572 | Good $47,221 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,243 | Excellent $56,546 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,243 | Poor $38,992 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,818 | Poor $51,421 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,824 | Good $96,525 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,736 | Excellent $103,507 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,989 | Average $61,244 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 29.2% |
Ethiopian vs Czech Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 26.9%), single father poverty (13.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 25.3%), and single male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.2%).
Poverty Metric | Ethiopian | Czech |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Females | Good 13.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 12.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Average 21.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 13.5% | Tragic 17.0% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Good 28.9% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Ethiopian vs Czech Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.3%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Ethiopian | Czech |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Average 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Ethiopian vs Czech Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (82.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ethiopian | Czech |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 69.3% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 82.0% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.2% | Exceptional 43.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.2% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.6% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 83.9% |
Ethiopian vs Czech Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.0%), married-couple households (43.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 14.5%), and currently married (44.5% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.31%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Ethiopian | Czech |
Family Households | Tragic 61.2% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Good 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.0% | Good 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.8% | Excellent 30.5% |
Ethiopian vs Czech Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 52.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 25.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ethiopian | Czech |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Exceptional 6.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Exceptional 93.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.1% | Exceptional 61.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 22.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Ethiopian vs Czech Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 62.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.5%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Ethiopian | Czech |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Fair 89.0% | Exceptional 91.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.0% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 67.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Excellent 60.6% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.4% | Good 47.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.8% | Average 38.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.0% | Average 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Good 1.9% |
Ethiopian vs Czech Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.8%), and male disability (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.2%).
Disability Metric | Ethiopian | Czech |
Disability | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Average 11.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.3% |