Uruguayan vs Czech Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,849,996 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechs within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.467. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Czechs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 56.8 Czechs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 16.0%), median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $56,546, a difference of 5.3%), and median family income ($100,656 compared to $105,839, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $38,992, a difference of 0.60%), per capita income ($44,318 compared to $44,595, a difference of 0.62%), and median household income ($84,691 compared to $86,164, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 34.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 33.9%), and receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.5%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.4%), currently married (45.6% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and married-couple households (45.5% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.010%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 63.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 30.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 50.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Czech communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 27.3%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.7%).