Costa Rican vs Celtic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Celtic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Celtics
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Celtic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,437,784 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,795 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 1.4%.
![Costa Rican vs Celtic Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/female-poverty/costa-ricans-vs-celtics-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Celtic |
Minimum | 3.4% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 45.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 42.4% | 97.8% |
Mean | 11.8% | 15.9% |
Median | 11.5% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Celtics by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |