Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Immigrants from Ethiopia
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,437,784 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,427,583 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.372 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 0.12%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
Minimum | 3.4% | 0.38% |
Maximum | 45.8% | 28.7% |
Range | 42.4% | 28.3% |
Mean | 11.8% | 12.7% |
Median | 11.5% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 14.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Immigrants from Ethiopia by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |