Costa Rican vs Slavic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Slavic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Slavs
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Slavic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,437,784 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,757,305 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 5.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Slavic |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 0.21% |
| Maximum | 45.8% | 46.6% |
| Range | 42.4% | 46.4% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 12.0% |
| Median | 11.5% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 13.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 8.0% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |