Costa Rican vs Pakistani Female Poverty
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Pakistani
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Costa Ricans
Pakistanis
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
63.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Pakistani Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,437,784 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.003 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,177,271 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.231 and weighted average of 12.9%, a difference of 2.6%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Costa Rican | Pakistani |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 0.74% |
| Maximum | 45.8% | 44.1% |
| Range | 42.4% | 43.3% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 14.0% |
| Median | 11.5% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Pakistanis by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (13.2%, a difference of 0.68%), Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Basque (12.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Icelander (13.0%, a difference of 0.32%), Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
| Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 76.9 /100 | #148 | Good 13.1% |
| Taiwanese | 75.7 /100 | #149 | Good 13.1% |
| Tsimshian | 75.5 /100 | #150 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 74.9 /100 | #151 | Good 13.1% |
| Samoans | 73.6 /100 | #152 | Good 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.0 /100 | #153 | Good 13.2% |
| Armenians | 70.4 /100 | #154 | Good 13.2% |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |