Guyanese vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guyanese
Zimbabwean
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Guyanese
Zimbabweans
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
52.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guyanese vs Zimbabwean Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,255,160 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guyanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,078,290 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 19.5%, a difference of 7.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guyanese | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 6.8% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 33.1% | 59.7% |
| Range | 26.2% | 58.6% |
| Mean | 19.3% | 18.9% |
| Median | 19.3% | 18.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 23.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.5% | 12.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 11.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Guyanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guyanese are Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.050%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |