Bolivian vs Iroquois Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bolivian
Iroquois
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Bolivians
Iroquois
4.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
13.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bolivian vs Iroquois Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,808,216 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bolivians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 4.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,259,155 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.297 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 20.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bolivian | Iroquois |
Minimum | 0.69% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 28.7% | 22.9% |
Range | 28.0% | 21.3% |
Mean | 5.3% | 7.4% |
Median | 4.2% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 9.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 4.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bolivians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bolivians are Immigrants from North Macedonia (4.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (4.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Turkey (4.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Switzerland (4.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and South African (4.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Greece | 98.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Canadians | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 4.6% |
South Africans | 98.7 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Bolivians | 98.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.5 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 98.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Basques | 98.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Norway | 98.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Koreans | 98.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Portuguese | 98.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Armenian (5.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |
Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% |
Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% |
Potawatomi | 12.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.5% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 5.5% |
Afghans | 11.2 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.5% |
Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |