Scandinavian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Scandinavian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
14.4%
POVERTY | BOYS < 16
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,968,733 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.457 and weighted average of 14.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.3% in poverty level among boys under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Scandinavians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Scandinavians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 within an area, or if Scandinavians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among boys under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Immigrants from Belgium (14.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (14.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Sweden (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Israel (14.4%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Immigrants from Pakistan | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.3% |
| Poles | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants from Sweden | 98.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants from Belgium | 98.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Scandinavians | 98.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Immigrants from Israel | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Cambodians | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 98.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Soviet Union | 98.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Immigrants from Bulgaria | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Immigrants from Europe | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Slovenes | 98.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Scandinavian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scandinavian Data | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.19% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 51.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 51.2% | 96.0% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 30.5% |
| Median | 10.3% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 37.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 24.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 26.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 26.5% |
Correlation Details
| Scandinavian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 369,110,543 | 17.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 57,663,191 | 12.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 17,948,979 | 12.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 7,934,289 | 11.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.21% | 4,441,382 | 10.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 2,151,869 | 9.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 762,131 | 12.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 414,788 | 10.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 144,166 | 19.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 93,219 | 14.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.31% | 60,541 | 17.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.74% | 88,377 | 17.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.27% | 36,691 | 16.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.77% | 34,491 | 12.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.31% | 25,389 | 8.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.65% | 12,518 | 21.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.32% | 7,381 | 19.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.71% | 4,879 | 32.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.32% | 1,824 | 34.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.77% | 3,041 | 30.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.31% | 6,344 | 8.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.69% | 2,714 | 15.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.29% | 62 | 71.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.59% | 984 | 22.2% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.22% | 1,931 | 32.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.61% | 357 | 77.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.33% | 150 | 54.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.80% | 594 | 15.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.10% | 3,836 | 8.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.56% | 4,314 | 10.4% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.38% | 676 | 100.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.61% | 205 | 45.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.60% | 3,325 | 39.9% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.24% | 2,100 | 26.5% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.18% | 198 | 100.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.33% | 119 | 71.4% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.26% | 127 | 4.0% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.92% | 894 | 34.9% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.81% | 31 | 100.0% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.09% | 46 | 20.0% |
[ 51.0% - 51.5% ] 51.35% | 37 | 50.0% |