Romanian vs Basque Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Romanian
Basque
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Romanians
Basques
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Basque Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 369,938,935 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,410,645 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 0.42%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Romanian | Basque |
Minimum | 4.0% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 70.0% | 54.1% |
Range | 66.0% | 52.2% |
Mean | 23.0% | 18.3% |
Median | 16.3% | 13.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.8% | 20.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.5% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.3% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.0% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians and Basques by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Chilean (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), British (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from South Africa (15.0%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Immigrants from Egypt (15.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Latvia (14.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Paraguayan (15.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from South Africa (15.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Germans | 96.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | France | 96.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Basques | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |