French Canadian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
COMPARE
French Canadian
Select to Compare
Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
French Canadian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
19.9%
POVERTY | FEMALES 18-24
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
French Canadian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 479,685,705 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.630 and weighted average of 19.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.3% in poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of French Canadians and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of French Canadians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 within an area, or if French Canadians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to French Canadians by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Malaysian (19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (19.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Belize (19.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (19.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
Hungarians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants from Belgium | 76.4 /100 | #156 | Good 19.8% |
Danes | 75.5 /100 | #157 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants from Lebanon | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 19.8% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 74.4 /100 | #159 | Good 19.8% |
Pakistanis | 74.1 /100 | #160 | Good 19.8% |
Immigrants from Belize | 74.1 /100 | #161 | Good 19.8% |
French Canadians | 73.0 /100 | #162 | Good 19.9% |
Malaysians | 72.7 /100 | #163 | Good 19.9% |
Central Americans | 70.0 /100 | #164 | Good 19.9% |
Eastern Europeans | 69.3 /100 | #165 | Good 19.9% |
Belgians | 69.1 /100 | #166 | Good 19.9% |
Czechoslovakians | 61.8 /100 | #167 | Good 20.0% |
Fijians | 59.1 /100 | #168 | Average 20.0% |
Hmong | 55.4 /100 | #169 | Average 20.0% |
French Canadian Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary
Measurement | French Canadian Data | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Data |
Minimum | 0.21% | 8.2% |
Maximum | 57.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 56.9% | 91.8% |
Mean | 16.0% | 32.0% |
Median | 13.7% | 21.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 17.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.8% | 31.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 26.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 25.9% |
Correlation Details
French Canadian Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 353,120,821 | 20.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 77,024,493 | 20.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 20,171,636 | 20.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 8,651,035 | 17.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.24% | 5,028,634 | 16.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 3,039,982 | 17.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 2,344,785 | 18.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.76% | 1,640,437 | 16.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 1,215,441 | 20.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.76% | 969,048 | 18.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.28% | 720,332 | 25.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.72% | 654,398 | 23.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.23% | 728,951 | 21.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 526,044 | 17.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.21% | 658,734 | 19.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72% | 384,898 | 15.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 674,145 | 17.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.79% | 157,221 | 20.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.26% | 266,121 | 23.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.67% | 187,586 | 25.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.28% | 324,462 | 15.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 232,779 | 22.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.28% | 90,582 | 19.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.78% | 46,700 | 13.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.22% | 76,855 | 18.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.74% | 243,278 | 13.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.22% | 16,152 | 21.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.75% | 27,545 | 36.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.22% | 85,775 | 17.4% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.72% | 64,231 | 22.4% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.07% | 15,122 | 18.4% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.80% | 40,661 | 28.5% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.33% | 19,465 | 15.7% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.62% | 26,394 | 8.2% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.11% | 49,907 | 25.5% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.70% | 9,122 | 37.3% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.45% | 9,040 | 35.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.94% | 92,431 | 16.3% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.29% | 21,266 | 30.7% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.64% | 392 | 17.6% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.31% | 7,234 | 31.1% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.78% | 231 | 100.0% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.37% | 4,833 | 21.8% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.87% | 2,154 | 88.3% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.34% | 1,474 | 44.4% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.71% | 561 | 56.9% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.03% | 1,490 | 11.2% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.30% | 1,522 | 86.1% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.14% | 224 | 100.0% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.98% | 3,190 | 31.3% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.66% | 2,883 | 35.1% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.82% | 119 | 100.0% |
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.70% | 576 | 97.3% |
[ 55.0% - 55.5% ] 55.41% | 915 | 100.0% |
[ 57.0% - 57.5% ] 57.15% | 1,398 | 25.7% |