Immigrants from Bahamas In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Immigrants from Bahamas In Labor Force | Age 30-34
84.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
2.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,609,089 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 84.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bahamas within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.98% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Bahamas and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Bahamas influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 within an area, or if Immigrants from Bahamas simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Welsh (84.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cuba (84.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Haiti (84.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Scottish (84.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (84.2%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Immigrants from Laos | 3.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 84.2% |
| Cubans | 3.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 84.2% |
| Scottish | 3.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 84.2% |
| Immigrants from El Salvador | 3.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 84.2% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 3.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 84.2% |
| Immigrants from Haiti | 2.8 /100 | #228 | Tragic 84.2% |
| Welsh | 2.7 /100 | #229 | Tragic 84.2% |
| Immigrants from Bahamas | 2.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 84.1% |
| Malaysians | 2.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 84.1% |
| Immigrants | 2.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 84.1% |
| West Indians | 1.9 /100 | #233 | Tragic 84.1% |
| Haitians | 1.8 /100 | #234 | Tragic 84.1% |
| French American Indians | 1.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 84.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 1.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 84.1% |
| Celtics | 1.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 84.1% |
Immigrants from Bahamas In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bahamas Data | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Data |
| Minimum | 0.012% | 60.2% |
| Maximum | 8.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 8.8% | 39.8% |
| Mean | 1.7% | 84.9% |
| Median | 1.0% | 84.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.46% | 82.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.1% | 89.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 8.6% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Bahamas Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.012% | 70,189,094 | 85.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.049% | 14,056,891 | 84.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.085% | 6,096,359 | 84.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 3,287,650 | 84.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 2,364,129 | 83.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 1,392,000 | 82.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 1,218,098 | 82.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.26% | 1,253,983 | 86.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.29% | 866,851 | 82.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 495,386 | 81.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 705,551 | 85.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 321,097 | 83.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 110,873 | 83.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 393,862 | 89.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 137,512 | 81.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 197,536 | 89.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 98,876 | 85.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.61% | 125,375 | 82.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.63% | 170,223 | 85.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 17,476 | 88.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 92,307 | 77.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 135,423 | 85.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 65,202 | 93.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 116,586 | 76.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 47,838 | 73.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 43,529 | 94.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 62,232 | 76.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 104,824 | 82.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 159,944 | 78.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 33,966 | 69.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 2,381 | 87.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 47,470 | 88.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 12,080 | 95.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.31% | 5,174 | 76.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 45,312 | 81.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.38% | 1,011 | 100.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 10,208 | 83.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 14,558 | 91.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 43,099 | 86.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 8,244 | 94.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 2,791 | 100.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 2,349 | 68.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.95% | 847 | 84.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.11% | 7,385 | 60.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.64% | 9,677 | 84.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 1,714 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.34% | 8,118 | 84.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.48% | 15,735 | 89.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.89% | 2,190 | 82.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.97% | 2,151 | 82.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.19% | 1,540 | 64.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 305 | 100.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.84% | 2,426 | 100.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.84% | 1,651 | 100.0% |