Immigrants from Oceania vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,046,765 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.274% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 273.7 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 10.3%), per capita income ($45,220 compared to $47,698, a difference of 5.5%), and median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $58,588, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $64,658, a difference of 0.38%), median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $40,491, a difference of 0.48%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $90,446, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.9%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 15.7%), and family poverty (8.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.14%), single female poverty (20.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.46%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.5%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.13, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.030%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.92%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 42.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.9%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.69%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.67%).