Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Northern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,766,770 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Northern Europeans within Immigrant from Sri Lanka communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.786. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sri Lanka within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.413% in Northern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sri Lanka corresponds to an increase of 1,413.3 Northern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($99,943 compared to $90,446, a difference of 10.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,094 compared to $107,870, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,741 compared to $100,457, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 4.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,512 compared to $51,678, a difference of 5.5%), and per capita income ($50,555 compared to $47,698, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.7%), single female poverty (18.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.5%), poverty (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 13.3%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.49%), currently married (48.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (65.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.3%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.2%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.45%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Northern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 38.1%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 27.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.6%).