Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,747,787 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Cape Verdeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,222 compared to $87,580, a difference of 39.6%), householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $50,077, a difference of 39.5%), and median household income ($104,796 compared to $75,848, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $51,387, a difference of 11.2%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 14.8%), and median female earnings ($46,502 compared to $38,614, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 126.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 45.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.7%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 49.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 44.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 38.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 73.7%), births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 65.0%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (64.9% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 25.6%), and no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 13.8%), and no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 104.9%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 95.4%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 72.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 62.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 61.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 8.6%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.4%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 17.3%).