Latvian vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,484,110 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.583% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 582.6 Cape Verdeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $50,077, a difference of 34.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $87,580, a difference of 32.4%), and per capita income ($52,649 compared to $39,935, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,387, a difference of 2.7%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $38,614, a difference of 13.8%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 131.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 55.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.18%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 56.9%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 46.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 67.5%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 49.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 59.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 39.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 101.0%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 85.8%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 78.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 39.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 32.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.7%).