Immigrants from North Macedonia vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,300,087 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Immigrant from North Macedonia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.205. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from North Macedonia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.163% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from North Macedonia corresponds to an increase of 162.8 Cape Verdeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,175 compared to $50,077, a difference of 22.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,892 compared to $87,580, a difference of 20.9%), and wage/income gap (28.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,488 compared to $38,614, a difference of 4.9%), householder income under 25 years ($56,503 compared to $51,387, a difference of 10.0%), and median earnings ($49,658 compared to $44,640, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 111.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 52.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 45.8%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 40.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 58.8%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 46.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.11%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and family households (64.7% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 46.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 54.2%), bachelor's degree (39.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 27.0%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from North Macedonia and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 37.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 35.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.4%).