Samoan vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Samoan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Samoans

Latvians

Fair
Exceptional
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Samoan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,980,550 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.794. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 9.7 Latvians.
Samoan Integration in Latvian Communities

Samoan vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,826 compared to $52,649, a difference of 32.2%), median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $63,498, a difference of 23.6%), and median earnings ($44,206 compared to $53,001, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $67,326, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,610 compared to $52,783, a difference of 3.5%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.3%).
Samoan vs Latvian Income
Income MetricSamoanLatvian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,826
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,344
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Good
$86,498
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,206
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,389
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,498
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,610
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,385
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,580
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,427
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.0%
Tragic
27.9%

Samoan vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 25.2%), and family poverty (8.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Samoan vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricSamoanLatvian
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Good
10.9%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.6%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
13.8%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
9.1%

Samoan vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.2%).
Samoan vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSamoanLatvian
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Samoan vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Samoan vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSamoanLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.5%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.2%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.8%

Samoan vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.8%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.7%), and births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (46.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 3.6%).
Samoan vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSamoanLatvian
Family Households
Exceptional
67.9%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.42
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.6%
Exceptional
27.7%

Samoan vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 50.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 29.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 28.3%).
Samoan vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSamoanLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
25.0%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.2%
Fair
6.1%

Samoan vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 87.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 81.2%), and master's degree (11.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 72.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.76%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.77%).
Samoan vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricSamoanLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.8%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.0%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.1%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.6%

Samoan vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 19.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.7%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Samoan vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricSamoanLatvian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Good
11.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.5%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%