Arab vs Latvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arab
Latvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arabs
Latvians
6,013
SOCIAL INDEX
57.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
166th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Latvian Integration in Arab Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,457,475 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.272. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Latvians.
Arab vs Latvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,662 compared to $52,649, a difference of 15.3%), median family income ($106,952 compared to $120,301, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,336 compared to $108,926, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $52,783, a difference of 3.0%), wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and median female earnings ($40,718 compared to $43,941, a difference of 7.9%).
Income Metric | Arab | Latvian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,662 | Exceptional $52,649 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,952 | Exceptional $120,301 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,398 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,599 | Exceptional $53,001 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,298 | Exceptional $63,498 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,718 | Exceptional $43,941 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,219 | Excellent $52,783 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,336 | Exceptional $108,926 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,566 | Exceptional $115,957 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $62,266 | Exceptional $67,326 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.6% | Tragic 27.9% |
Arab vs Latvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 45.0%), family poverty (9.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 30.5%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 5.3%).
Poverty Metric | Arab | Latvian |
Poverty | Fair 12.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Fair 9.2% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Poor 20.5% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Average 17.4% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.6% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Good 20.7% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Good 29.0% | Exceptional 26.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Arab vs Latvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 14.3%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Arab | Latvian |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.5% | Excellent 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Arab vs Latvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arab | Latvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.2% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.2% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.8% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Poor 82.4% | Exceptional 83.8% |
Arab vs Latvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.16%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (64.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Arab | Latvian |
Family Households | Fair 64.1% | Tragic 62.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Good 46.9% | Exceptional 47.9% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.2% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Arab vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.82%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arab | Latvian |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Excellent 9.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.0% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Fair 19.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Fair 6.1% |
Arab vs Latvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 36.3%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.60%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.61%).
Education Level Metric | Arab | Latvian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Good 96.2% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Good 95.9% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Good 95.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.0% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.6% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Excellent 89.7% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.2% | Exceptional 71.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.6% | Exceptional 66.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.0% | Exceptional 53.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.9% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Arab vs Latvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 7.6%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Disability Metric | Arab | Latvian |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Excellent 11.0% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.8% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Average 3.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Exceptional 2.3% |