Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,195,983 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to a decrease of 3.4 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,531 compared to $52,649, a difference of 13.2%), median family income ($108,161 compared to $120,301, a difference of 11.2%), and wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $52,783, a difference of 0.76%), median female earnings ($42,084 compared to $43,941, a difference of 4.4%), and median earnings ($49,648 compared to $53,001, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 33.7%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 24.3%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.3%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.93%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (63.5% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.11, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 28.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.1%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.4%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.71%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%).