Vietnamese vs Latvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,315,667 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Vietnamese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.201. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Vietnamese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Vietnamese corresponds to a decrease of 4.2 Latvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 32.7%), median family income ($96,123 compared to $120,301, a difference of 25.2%), and per capita income ($42,368 compared to $52,649, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,127 compared to $52,783, a difference of 6.3%), median female earnings ($40,377 compared to $43,941, a difference of 8.8%), and median earnings ($46,172 compared to $53,001, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 90.4%), receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 71.7%), and family poverty (11.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.0%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.90%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 38.8%), unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 37.8%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 31.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.2%), currently married (44.0% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and married-couple households (43.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (64.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 168.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 57.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.8% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 22.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.5% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 46.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 54.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 106.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 39.1%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Vietnamese and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.81% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 61.6%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 34.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.2%).