Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Latvians

Fair
Exceptional
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Latvian Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,146,117 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.017. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Latvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Latvians.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Latvian Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $52,649, a difference of 32.2%), median family income ($94,472 compared to $120,301, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $115,957, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $52,783, a difference of 8.3%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $43,941, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $67,326, a difference of 17.9%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarLatvian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Exceptional
$52,649
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Exceptional
$120,301
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Exceptional
$97,311
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Exceptional
$53,001
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Exceptional
$63,498
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Exceptional
$43,941
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Excellent
$52,783
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Exceptional
$108,926
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Exceptional
$115,957
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Exceptional
$67,326
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Tragic
27.9%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 54.5%), family poverty (10.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 48.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.050%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.8%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarLatvian
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
19.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
13.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
13.5%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
26.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.1%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarLatvian
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Excellent
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarLatvian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Exceptional
38.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
83.8%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.4%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.8%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.29%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 5.9%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarLatvian
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
62.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
47.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.11
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Exceptional
48.5%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.75%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarLatvian
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Excellent
90.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Fair
6.1%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 103.9%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 58.2%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarLatvian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
95.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
94.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
89.2%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Exceptional
71.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Exceptional
66.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
53.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
46.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
19.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.6%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Latvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 20.7%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.20%), male disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Latvian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarLatvian
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Excellent
11.4%
Males
Average
11.2%
Good
11.1%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Exceptional
21.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%